← Course contents · Using LLMs in this course
Repetition
Learning typically requires multiple repetitions, and it is best if those repetitions are spread out in time.
Useful words
The previous topic is all about what words are useful. In general, those are the most common 2,000 words plus another 1,000 or so which might focus on one genre, such as academic vocabulary .
Variety
Students need to see the word and hear the word. It's great if they can connect an image to the word. If the word has different forms, it's useful if they are encountered. Seeing the word in and out of context in various sentences or definitions is also helpful.
Attention
It is not merely enough to encounter the word while your mind is somewhere else. The more attention and engagement you can bring to the word, the better.
Barriers to repetition
Barriers to useful vocabulary
Barriers to variety
Barriers to attention
Deliberate practice (DelP) is the key to learning almost anything. The reason I specifically bring it up in our discussion vocabulary learning is that
As you can see, DelP is a good fit for learning vocabulary, while it's not as easy with grammar and pronunciation, which are often much fuzzier, harder to get feedback on, harder to explain and understand, and hard to make and check goals about.
DelP has two other features, which are important, but not particularly suited to vocabulary learning.
DelP differs from naive practice and purposeful practice.
Naive practice
This is what most people do when they practice. It's not bad to get from zero to something, but it will only get you so far. Here are some examples of naive practice.
Purposeful practice
This is much better than naive practice, and sometimes, it's the best you can do, but it's generally not as effective as DelP. The main difference from naive practice is that people who are practicing purposefully have a SMART goal.
The main difference between purposeful practice and deliberate practice is in the immediate, specific feedback.
Meaning is dealt with in the branch of linguistics (and of philosophy) called semantics. Explaining the meaning of words, specifically, as dictionaries do, is dealt with in lexicography. (The authority of "The Dictionary" is covered in module three.)
The first part of this video is a good, basic introduction to the meaning of words. The rest of it is interesting but not especially relevant to ELT.
Notice the idea of categories, which we looked at in the first module comes up again here. Finding and explaining meaningful categories is central to language and to language teaching.
The easiest and most efficient way to explain the meaning of a word is to translate it. Many language teachers are prejudiced against the use of the first language. It is certainly possible to go overboard in using the L1, and you may have been in classes that predominantly use the L1 to teach an L2. But the use of the L1 is well justified on both empirical and philosophical grounds. It is vanishingly rare for an L1 translation to ever a perfectly capture the meaning of a word, but that problem applies to any method for conveying meaning. Translation is especially useful for low-frequency items that would otherwise take up too much class time to deal with.
When you don't translate, you should
Nobody is naturally good at explaining the meaning of words, but that's a lot of what language teachers do, and if you want to be a good language teacher, it's useful for you to be able to describe the meaning of words. This requires deliberate practice (see above). If you expect your students to do deliberate practice (and you should), then you should also be willing to engage in deliberate practice. The best way to do this is to
I did my deliberate practice on the Simple English Wiktionary, where you can see thousands of my definitions and examples.
I'm not going to try to be systematic about vocabulary learning techniques. Rather, I'll focus on those that I think are most effective:
This is by far the most efficient way to learn a form-meaning pairing. In fact, a very recent meta analysis shows that the average person can learn a word a minute using this technique, and that's on a delayed post-test (Webb, Yanagisawa, & Uchihara, 2020).
BUT...
There are people for whom these work, but most people lack the motivation and self-control.
Also, this is by far the most efficient way to learn a form-meaning pairing. It is less effective for learning other aspects of vocabulary (e.g., register & collocations).
Usually this involves some kind of paper or computerized flashcards.
At the simplest, use a word and its L1 translation
|
トイレ (toire) |
toilet |
|
わかりません (wakarimasen) |
(I) don't understand |
|
やめて (yamete) |
stop (it/doing that) |
|
英語 (eigo) |
English |
|
服 (fuku) |
clothing |
Much better is to use a simple sentence that exemplifies the word well, along with its translation.
|
トイレ は、どこですか? |
Where's the toilet? |
|
日本語が わかりません 。 |
I don't understand Japanese. |
|
話をやめて ください。 |
Please, stop talking. |
|
英語 ができますか? |
Do you speak English? |
|
その服 が合わない。 |
Those clothes don't match. |
You can also add the lexical category or other information, and, if the word has multiple forms, then it might be useful to add them to your word card, as in the following case:
|
I'm too busy to go to the movies.
|
|
Je suis trop occupé pour aller au
cinéma.
Adjective |
Steps
This technique has excellent results when it is used. Unfortunately, it is challenging to execute, and so it is not often used.
Steps
Teachers should
Learners should
Classroom activities should (Yousefi & Biria, 2018) encourage
and should make use of the fact that students are together in the classroom. In other words, gathering a bunch of people together in a room and then getting them to work individually on what is a very social skill - language - is a wasted opportunity.
Extensive Reading usually means reading a lot of self-selected, easy, interesting texts and doing few or no exercises afterwards.
Reading requires automatic recognition of words. Learners become able to do this only through massive amounts of practice. By reading extensively, learners encounter vocabulary (and grammar) repeatedly and in varying contexts.
Extensive reading is a good complement to word cards which mainly help form-meaning pairs. Successful individual reading experiences promote learner autonomy which leads to "learning success and enhanced motivation".
Studies show that by reading a lot of interesting texts, foreign language learners learn a little new vocabulary and learn more about old vocabulary. They improve their attitude toward reading and language learning. They improve their writing ability and read more fluently (Jeon & Day, 2016; Liu & Zhang, 2018; Nakanishi, 2015).
Some minor difficulties are that teachers can feel they have no role. Administrators may similarly wonder what a teacher is doing. To overcome this, the teacher can conference with individual learners while the others are reading. Also, it may be difficult to develop or access a library of readers, though there are paid online options, such as XReading.
How do you say ditch in Indonesian and happy in Japanese?
Jeon, E.-Y., & Day, R. R. (2016). The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 246-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/SOI42716411000932
Liu, J., & Zhang, J. (2018). The effects of extensive reading on English vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. English Language Teaching, 11(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n6p1
Nakanishi, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.157
Webb, S., Yanagisawa, A., & Uchihara, T. (2020). How effective are intentional vocabulary‐learning activities? A meta‐analysis. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12671
Yousefi, M. H., & Biria, R. (2018). The effectiveness of L2 vocabulary instruction: a meta-analysis. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education , 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0062-2
It seems obvious that you would teach related words together. This is useful in some ways but actually can cause problems in certain cases.
Imagine you're learning a language called Verdic, and your Verdic teacher introduces the following three words:
When you come back the next day, your teacher asks you if you remember the topic of yesterday's lesson. Of course, you do, it was about citrus fruits. "Great," your Verdic teacher says. "Do you remember which fruits we studied?" Again, you do: mandarine, clementine, and navel oranges. "Wonderful," your teacher exclaims. "So, how do you say navel orange in Verdic?"
Of course, all you can remember is that it starts with v and ends with rd.
Studying a semantic set like this makes it very easy to recall the list of things for which you learned words, but the words get all mixed up. And, of course, when the words themselves are similar, it becomes even harder.
Many textbooks and language teachers introduce new vocabulary in groups like this: things you find in the kitchen, the months of the year, free time activities, colours, etc. This is counter-productive. It makes it easier for students to remember the topic, but harder for them to remember which word applies to which case.
You also tend to see new vocabulary listed alphabetically. Thus, you get lists like comment, commit, committee, common, community, company. This is how an evil genius would teach English. Don't be an evil genius.
On the other hand, it can be fine to group words by word families. In other words, when you introduce bake, you could also introduce baker, and maybe even bakery. These are unlikely to be confused, and they mean that bake gets more repetition and variety.
In general, it's best to focus on words that are not closely semantically related (kinds of orange, days of the week), but it's fine to have some general topical similarity. For example, you could have going out for coffee as your theme, and you could include words like table, friend, chat, pay, and spill.
Above all, make sure that your vocabulary is USEFUL, and that it is grouped by frequency, for example: first 500 words, 501-1,000; 1,000-2,000 and AWL. These frequency bands can be quite broad and they can be flexible around the edges. It would be pointless to avoid putting word #450 together with #540 because they're in different bands. But you should wonder about the wisdom of putting #45 together with #1,450.
In short, group thematically and frequentially (new vocabulary). Feel free to teach word families instead of individual lexemes, but avoid words that are otherwise similar in terms of meaning, spelling, or pronunciation.
Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000195
Higa, M. (1963). Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 170-75.
Schurgin, M. W., Wixted, J. T., & Brady, T. F. (2020). Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00938-0
Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25, 2, 261-74.
Vocabulary should be an element in most lesson plans, but I see no role for a "vocabulary lesson". Consequently, I see no role for a vocabulary lesson plan. The question, then is how to fit vocabulary into a general lesson plan.
Some vocabulary should be addressed before a lesson. Target vocabulary can be dealt with in an activity such as matching or peer teaching with with flashcard exchange. Topic-essential low-frequency words can be provided in a list with a gloss, but very little time should be spent focusing on or "teaching" these items.
Target vocabulary can be identified in any printed materials through typographical features such as bold, underline, or colour. Glosses or translations can be provided nearby in the text or on a separate page. Before a first listening, the teacher could ask students to count the number of times a particular word (or two) appears. During a listening activity, the teacher can pause before the occurrence of a target word and ask student to guess which one might appear. Alternatively the teacher can pause after an occurrence and review the meaning and pronunciation.
Review is crucial. Activities like dictogloss or cloze summary can be used to focus both on the core lesson goals and on target vocabulary at the same time. Students can be given homework on sites like Linguatorium.
Learners need strategies for the following: